Relation to IAM and Zero Trust
Core distinction
Zero Trust focuses on access trust (who/what may access which resource, under which conditions). GTAF focuses on decision trust: who is authorized to define delegable decision spaces, where those decisions apply, who owns outcomes, and how intervention remains reachable.
How GTAF complements Zero Trust
- Zero Trust answers connection and access.
- GTAF answers decision authority within explicit boundaries and scope.
- Zero Trust enforces access policies; GTAF ensures the authority to define those policies is legitimate and bounded.
Structural bridge
GTAF can be viewed as "zero trust for authority":
- Decision Records define what may be delegated.
- Responsibility Bindings keep outcome ownership explicit.
- DRC provides a binary gate before delegation.
Guardrail
GTAF does not replace IAM or Zero Trust. It formalizes the delegation semantics that sit upstream of enforcement.